|
2004年9月
【注释】 Neil MacCormick, “Does the United Kingdom Have a Constitution? ” (1978) Modern Law Review 1; Eric Barendt, “Is there a United Kingdom Constitution?” (1997) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 137.
Jeffrey Jowell, “Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review” (1999) Public Law 448; “Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review” (2000) Public Law 671.
A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th, Macmillan, 1959), pp.39-40.
ibid, p.145.
W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England（ⅰ）: The Rights of Persons (Clarendon Press, 1765), p.91.
Bentham, “Anarchical Fallacies”, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham (W. Tait, 1838-1843), ⅱ, p.501. Quoted from H. L. A. Hart, Essays on Bentham: Studies on Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Clarendon Press, 1982), p.79.
E. Burk, “Speech on the Opening of the Impeachment of Warren Hastings (1788)”, in P. Langford (ed.), The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, ⅵ (Clarendon Press, 1991), p.470. Quoted from Jeffery Goldsworthy, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Clarendon Press, 1999), pp.185-6.
W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England（ⅰ）: The Rights of Persons (Clarendon Press, 1765), pp.237-8; J. Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1954, ed. by H. L. A. Hart), p.298; A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th, Macmillan, 1959), pp.76-9.
A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th, Macmillan, 1959), p.60.
Foone v. Blount 2 Cowper 464, at 466; 98 ER 1180, at 1190.
Webb v. Outrim AC 81 (PC, per Lord Halsbury). Quoted in Robert Stevens, Law and Politics: The House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1800-1976 (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1979), p.181.
Madzimbamuto v. Lardne-Burke 1 AC 645, at 723 (per Lord Reid). 类似地，Ungoed-Thomas 法官说：“议会立法不可能违法，因为它本身就是这个国家最高形式的法律。”Cheney v. Conn 1 All ER 779, at 782. Morris法官说：“在法庭上，你可以争论议会立法的正确含义，但不应争论它是否有效。”Pickin v. British Railways Board AC 765, at 789.
Bonaham’s Case 8 Co Rep 107a, 113b, at 118a; 77 ER 638, 646, at 652. 关于该案的详细讨论，参见Theodore F. T. Plucknett, “Bonham’s Case and Judicial Review” (1926) Harvard Law Review 30.
Edward Corwin, “The ‘Higher Law’ Background of American Constitutional Law (part 2)” (1929) Harvard Law Review 365; Charles G. Haines, “The Revival of Natural Law Concepts” (Russell & Russell Inc, 1958), pp.56-7.
Parish of Great Charte v. Parish of Kennington 2 Strange 1173; 93 ER 1107, at 1108 (KB).
Mersey Docks and Harbour Board Trustee v. Gibbs LR 1 HL 93, at 110 (per Blackburn).
Lee v. Bude and Torrington Junction Railway Company LR 6 CP 576, at 582 (per Willes).
S. E. Thorne, “Dr. Bonham’s Case” (1938) Law Quarterly Review 543
关于事件过程，参见R. F. V. Heuston, Essays in Constitutional Law (2nd, Stevens & Sons, 1964), pp.85-98.
相关案件参见Stockdale v. Hansard 9 Ad & E 1, 11 Ad & E 253, 297; 112 ER 1112, 113 ER 411, 428.
Sir John Campbell, The Parliamentary Debate (Hansard), 3rd Ser., vol.48, col. 365-6 (17 June 1839), quoted by J. Goldsworthy, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Clarendon Press, 1999), p.242.
Sheriff of Middlesex Case 11 Ad & E 273; 113 ER 419.
关于美国立法权委任的司法审查，可参见王名扬《美国行政法》，中国法制出版社1995年，292-309页；欧内斯特•盖尔霍恩、罗纳德•M•利文《行政法和行政程序概要》，黄列译，中国社会科学出版社1996年，6-18页；理查德•B•斯图尔特《美国行政法的重构》，沈岿译，商务印书馆2002年，37-42页。
Westminster Cpn. v. North Western Railway Co. (1905) AC 426 (per Lord Halsbury).
Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation 1 KB 223. 该案中，相关法律允许电影院在星期天放映电影，同时授权地方当局在发放放映许可证时附加“任何它认为合适的条件”。一个地方当局规定：“15岁以下的儿童，不管是否有大人陪同，都不得进入电影院。”上诉法院认为该规定不违反理性原则。
参见John Griffith, Judicial Politics since 1920: A Chronicle (Blackwell, 1993), chap. 4 “The New Look of the Sixties”.
|
